因AI翻译引发的一点思考

下面这篇文章，我读了两遍，用词典翻译了几次词，仍然没有读懂。你可以尝试一下。

The products aren't good enough to sell people on the costs. You cannot tell people that you have to listen to the whine of a data center in their backyard for AI overviews and some of the most hilarious deep fake slop in history. It's not worth it. It just isn't worth it to anyone. And agents aren't real and they might not be being used the way that anyone wants them to yet. All these companies are spending more than they're making on these products. Refrigerators holding blood storage in Europe are being hacked. The costs are too high. The benefits are not real. And if you connect that to corruption, you're like, in order to impose these costs on me, these CEOs are in the White House shaking Trump's hand, renaming it to the Gulf of America, paying for this ballroom that we don't want. It's obvious crypto-corruption, and it's still slop. The AI industry will not get out of it until they make better products. Until everyone can see without needing to be convinced, without needing an ad campaign, without any of this stuff that just using these products makes your life better.

我用普通词典翻译一下，不通。于是问了豆包：

我感觉这篇文章读不懂，是否因为作者写法太地道了

豆包回复：

先说结论： ✅ 不是你的英语差，核心原因不是 “地道”，而是这是一段情绪化、跳跃式的口语化随笔 / 推特长文，自带大量小众隐喻、梗、私设论点，逻辑是联想式而非论证式；同时夹杂圈内黑话、时事暗指。它本身就不是写给普通读者看懂的规范文章。

然后豆包给出了合理的翻译，从这个事我们可以发现：

1. 实时上下文非常重要，互联网是AI的源头活水，更确切说人类贡献是源头活水，如果这个世界都是AI贡献内容，则会陷入它的信息茧房，的确就是deep fake slop。
2. 不论2C还是2B，尤其是2B，AI一定要和现有系统打通，否则，AI的价值几乎无法体现，这么看，MCP的确需要深入理解并且应用，会用和用好差距很大。
3. AI本身很强大，但是我定位是智能工具，没有人+的生态，他会枯萎。